From squirrel@echelon.alias.net Fri Jul 23 14:26:26 1999
Path: newscene.newscene.com!newscene!novia!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newshub.northeast.verio.net!kiowa!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news-x2!mail2news
Date: 23 Jul 1999 21:26:26 -0000
Subject: FZ Bible 10/10 HCL LECTURES - FINAL SECTION
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology
Message-ID: <31d36f211397143ffc2dd17b22892b4f@anonymous.poster>
Sender: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to
	<squirrel-admin@echelon.alias.net>. The message sender's identity
	is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable.
From: Secret Squirrel <squirrel@echelon.alias.net>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net
Lines: 1408
Xref: newscene alt.religion.scientology:885918 alt.clearing.technology:91919

FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST

HCL LECTURES - FINAL SECTION 10/10

**************************************************

HCL LECTURES - FINAL SECTION (Mar-April 1952)

CONTENTS:

1.  THE SUCCESS OF DIANETICS
2.  HCL-23 THETA BODIES
3.  HCL-21 ANATOMY OF THE THETA BODY
4.  HCL-22 HOW TO AUDIT A THETA LINE, PARTS I AND II
5.  HCL-25 AN ANALYSIS OF MEMORY AND HUMAN ABBERATION, PART I
6.  HCL-26 AN ANALYSIS OF MEMORY AND HUMAN ABERRATION, Part II
7.  HCL-27 HOW TO SEARCH FOR INCIDENTS ON THE TRACK, PART I
8.  HCL-27A HOW TO SEARCH FOR INCIDENTS ON THE TRACK, PART II
9.  HCL-DEMO: THETA BODY DEMONSTRATION
10. APPENDIX

Note that HCL-27 includes HCL-18.

Dates and tape renumbering here are complex.  See the Appendix
and the beginnings of the individual tapes.  Other lectures
may be missing and are not in the R&Ds, especially HCL-23A
"Impulses of a Thetan" and HCL-24A "Theta Bodies".  But tape
HCL-24 is assumed to be either HCL-12A or HCL-6 Spec.

Previously posted in this series:

FZ BIBLE 1/4 HPC TAPES 1952 (Fdn Business & HofM Incidents)
  [These are an introduction to the HCL series]

FZ BIBLE 1/10 HCL TAPES of 1952, FIRST SECTION
  [HCL-1 to 6A]

FZ BIBLE 0/10 HCL TAPES PART 2 (1952)
  [HCL-7 to 17]

FZ BIBLE 1/4 TIME TRACK OF THETA  
  [HCL 19 and 20]

FZ BIBLE - BATTLE OF THE UNIVERSES - CONFIDENTIAL TAPE
  [HCL-Spec]

This coveres the entirity of all material from the middle of
New R&D Vol. 9 to the middle of New R&D Vol 10 as well as much
material that was omitted from the R&Ds.  Immediately after 
this in New R&D 10 are the Route To Infinity lectures (Tech 
80 lectures) which we posted last year.


**************************************************

STATEMENT OF PURPOSE 

Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology
Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet.

The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of
Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists.  It misuses the
copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom.

They think that all freezoner's are "squirrels" who should be
stamped out as heritics.  By their standards, all Christians, 
Moslems, Mormons, and even non-Hassidic Jews would be considered
to be squirrels of the Jewish Religion.

The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings
of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity.

We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according
to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against.

But even though the Christians are not good and obedient Jews,
the rules of religious freedom allow them to have their old 
testament regardless of any Jewish opinion.  

We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion
as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures
without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists.

We ask for others to help in our fight.  Even if you do
not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope
that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose
to aid us for that reason.

Thank You,

The FZ Bible Association

**************************************************


APPENDIX

We have included here a number of documents that were included
in New R&D Volumes 9 and 10 along with the HCL transcripts
(these transcripts occupy the 2nd half of R&D 9 and the first
half of R&D 10).  Also note that the old tech volumes end
just before this lecture series (the volumes are shorter and
the final volume, number 10, ends in Feb 1952.)

We have also included some material from the Professional Course
Booklets which were done as a companion to these lectures.


Appendix A. Telegram announcing the course
Appendix B. A letter about Milestone One
Appendix C. HUBBARD COLLEGE Announcement
Appendix D. A STORY 
Appendix E. TRAINING PLAN 
Appendix F. PROFESSIONAL COURSE BOOKLETS description (Tech Vol 1)
Appendix G. NOTES ON THE PROFESSIONAL COURSE BOOKLET TAPE NUMBERING
Appendix H. HOW THESE BOOKLETS WERE WRITTEN from booklet 26
Appendix I. BOOKLET 18 "ENTITIES" (complete)

The following are attached to our posting of tapes HCL-25 and
HCL-26 respectively.

Appendix J. BOOKLET 25 "ANALYSIS OF MEMORY AND ABBERATION I" (complete)
Appendix K. BOOKLET 26 "ANALYSIS OF MEMORY AND ABBERATION II"(remainder)


Note that the clearsound version of the HCL lecture series is now 
available as the "Dawn of Immortality" tapes on clearsound from
Cof$.  We don't know how many of these lectures were included or
if things were omitted.  If someone has this set, please post
a list of the tapes included and also check the individual lectures
for omitted sections.


=========================
Appendix A. Telegram announcing the course


[From New R&D 9 page 444, immediately before lecture HCL-1.]

WESTERN UNION  Recieved Jan 24, 1952.

[Telegram header info]

HUBBARD DIANETIC FOUNDATION 211 WEST DOUGLAS

  WICHITA KANS =

AM GIVING A SERIES OF LECTURES 5 HOURS PER DAY FOR 10 DAYS
AS THE PROFESSIONAL COURSE TAPES, BEGINNING MAR 03. THIS SERIES
TO COVER THE WHOLE OF DIANETICS AS IT EXISTS TO DATE.

WILL REQUIRE GOOD RECORDING EQUIPMENT, ADVISE THAT YOU
INFORM AFFILIATES AS THIS WILL BE A PROFESSIONAL COURSE
WITHOUT ANY REMISSION OF FEE AND WILL NOT BE A CONFERENCE
BUT THEY MIGHT LIKE TO HAVE SOME OF THEIR STUDENTS ATTEND.

BEST REGARDS GLAD YOU ARE WELL =

   RON =


=========================
Appendix B. A letter about Milestone One


[From New R&D 10 page xiv.  This is a letter with Ron's signature
at the bottom.]


OFFICE OF L. RON HUBBARD Phoenix, Arizona

March 30, 1952

My dear friends:

Service and new developments are all that I can give you.
Books, courses, tapes. All the information I have developed
and continue to develop on DIANETICS and SCIENTOLOGY. Data
about how to make people well faster, how to make well
people better.

Actually, this is and always has been part of a wider
program, the program which includes the third and fourth
dynamic. For a long time there have been many things on our
future time track. There was the university, a place where
the broader applications of arts and science could help to
realize a better Earth. And not least is that item called
the atom bomb and programs to either defeat its destruction
if applied or even to nullify its application.

Very few people have realized that while organizational
shapes have changed, the program has never changed. It has
not even been slowed regardless of organizational ineptness
for the first point I had to win for us all was MILESTONE
ONE. That had to be reached. MILESTONE ONE is the point
where you and I as individuals, become the best beings we
know how to be. The techniques to permit us to reach that
had to be perfected and they had to be perfected to a point
where not just Hubbard could "make it work": they had to
come up to point where an auditor, with minimal study,
could make it work. Well, we have the techniques and
communications lines, from this office to you, to permit
MILESTONE ONE TO BE ATTAINED. I am getting my two hours a
day. You, with the information now developed can, with me,
reach that milestone.

So near is this goal, so easy is it to attain now, that at
last the wider program of DIANETICS can begin, emanating, 
in terms of service and publications and packaged courses, 
from this office. Dozens of clears are backing it up in 
every part of the country. We're away from the post and 
beginning to assemble a MILESTONE ONE. So what if it took 
me longer to get us away than we hoped? The point is that 
we're already on our way on the third and fourth dynamics 
and we daily have more reaching MILESTONE ONE. Our cleared 
nuclear physicists are springing up with data which should 
alarm proponents of bombs. And our communications, by August,
Will reach the world.

Now I am going to need your help to carry the fort. I'm
going to need good, solid, loyal cooperation, a deaf ear 
to the entheta merchants, a turned back to those who would
stop us legally or organizationally. With cooperation we 
can turn the world into something better than an entheta
factory for the hopeless.

I want you to write and tell me how things look from your
viewpoint and give me your suggestions as to what we should
do to make DIANETICS roll. And then I can give you service 
enough to get this job done. We need to be a close-knit, one 
goal group, individually and collectively strong enough to
make ourselves felt and felt like a battering ram in the
cause of sanity. Forget yesterday. Let's be sane enough to 
capture tomorrow. Are you with me at MILESTONE ONE?


All my best,

L. RON HUBBARD


=========================
Appendix C. HUBBARD COLLEGE Announcement


[From New R&D 10 p. 257, immediately after the History of Man
lectures.  The date of the article or where it appeared are
not stated.]

[An article announcing the establishment of the Hubbard
College and The Office of L. Ron Hubbard on the Central
Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona.]


HUBBARD COLLEGE


Hubbard College is established in Phoenix, Arizona. It
consists of a graduate school and an extension course
college. Hubbard College Associates are operating in the
major cities of the United States and Canada, and these are
individuals and groups who have agreed to furnish training
facilities on a par with those available in Phoenix.

The Office of L. Ron Hubbard, at 1405 North Central,
Phoenix, Arizona, handles correspondence, book orders, and
acts as general communications center for Mr. Hubbard and
Hubbard College. Of particular interest to groups
everywhere are the various services offered by this Office.
Groups can register with the Office merely by sending in a
list of the officers and members and listing the official
group name and address. Once a group is registered, it is
eligible for 40% discount on publications, and can get
special Group Courses to aid in training.

The Group Courses are actually a part of the Hubbard
College Extension Program. One course consists of 12
lectures on tape recordings, by L. Ron Hubbard, accompanied
by 10 sets of twelve booklets which are to be studied in
conjunction with the tape lectures. Ten sets of other
needed instructional materials are included, such as
Handbook for Preclears and Advanced Procedure and Axioms.
Included in this course is a Mathison Electropsychometer.
The total value of all these items is over $500, and the
Course is offered to Groups at $250. Thus a group of ten
people can obtain all the needed data and materials to
begin active and effective work in Dianetics, at $25 per
person. This is truly a bargain.

Another longer course for Groups consists or 27 taped
lectures and accompanying materials for twenty-five people.
The cost of this is under $400.

College Associates offer courses similar to the long course
mentioned above. Anyone who successfully completes the long
course, either at a College Associate or through Group
work, receives the designation of "Registered Dianeticist."
College Associates also offer more complete courses leading
to certification as a Hubbard Dianetic Auditor (H.D.A.).

Instruction at Hubbard College is personally supervised by
Ron Hubbard, and he participates in personal lectures and
instruction of the students there. The regular H.D.A.
course at the College is eight weeks in length and costs
$500 plus room and board. Graduate courses are also
offered; these are intended for those who already possess
H.D.A. certificates and who have been practicing
extensively for some time. These courses lead to the degree
of Bachelor of Dianetics; Masters and Doctors degrees in
Dianetics are also available after taking much longer
courses through special arrangements. Auditors who have
been certified by College Associates may take their degree
courses, if they are qualified, by going to Phoenix.

Many of the newer concepts in Dianetics are far beyond the
bounds of what this society generally considers possible.
As an aid to meeting the inevitable resistance which arises
in such circumstances, the small, 12 lecture Group Course
described above contains only a bare minimum of the more
advanced information; yet the data presented is sufficient
to get newcomers in the field well launched as auditors.
From then on, they will presumably unearth some of the
newer concepts in their own work.

==========================================
Appendix D. A STORY 


[From New R&D 10 p. 275, immediately after the "Dianetics
Success" lecture.  The caption says "Ron wrote this parable
shortly after moving to Phoenix."]


     A STORY

Once upon a time there was a man, or perhaps he was not 
a man, who slept for a very long time.

When he laid himself down to rest, the world was not
too terrible. People were happy and their actions were
productive and the green hills had flowers upon them.

When he awakened, however, things had changed. He stood 
outside his cave and looked at the world. Yes, somehow 
it had changed. The hills were ugly and brown. Near
at hand two women were quarreling. Far away a red cloud
rose and when he looked more closely he saw that it was a
battle. And so he walked down through the fields and towns
trying to find what had happened.

Men glowered at him. Children did not play. And there was
little food and the haggard faces of all showed that each
staggered under some heavy burden of grief. And the man, or
perhaps he was not a man, saw that the world had come into
trying times.

He wandered about, understanding that here he faced a black 
enchantment, thickly laid upon the souls of men. Perhaps 
some sorcerer had done it to men, perhaps men had done it 
to themselves. But it did not matter. The world had gone 
mad. Somebody must do something.

The man thought for many days. And then he made a golden
ball and filled it with everything necessary to undo a
black enchantment. It was a very pretty ball, on the end of
an ivory stick. And it was very easy to use for one had but
to hold it over the head of a human being and wish him well
to break the thrall which held that being.


And the man went forth and held it over the heads of
dozens of people and did not tell them what it was and they
suddenly smiled and became bright and the thrall was broken
for them. And the man saw that this was good and so he
showed many people how to use the golden ball and told them
all that was necessary to break the black enchantment clear
across the whole world.

And some used it. But others said, "Isn't it pretty!" and
began to play catch with it. And some said, "It isn't
really gold." And some wanted to hide it for fear it would
be stolen. And some said, "It's GOLD!" and bought knives
and pistols with it and fought. And some said cunningly,
"With thig POWER I can rule Earth." And others simply ran
about and said it wasn't really a ball and that the man had
stolen it from others and they clutched their black
enchantment about them and whispered that the man had done
it in the first place and that he planned to kill them all.

But the man paid little heed. He tried to form companies 
to make the golden ball available to many. But the people 
in the companies said, "It's mine!" "It's power!" "It's gold!" 
and "The man will kill us all!" and so they fought amongst 
themselves and threw dust over the golden ball and tried 
to dent it.

And at last the man sat down in a desert place and sent
his word about that anybody could use this ball that wanted
it. And they sent officers and thieves and lawyers at him
to say that nobody could use the ball.

And they took the man's captain and said they would imprison 
him for saying the golden ball was owned by everybody. And 
they made the government put guards around the man in case 
anybody sent him money to help ship the golden ball to everyone.

And the man looked st these people and not one of them who 
hated the golden ball had ever used it in any way but only 
thrown dust on it and tried to dent it and he looked at the 
sly people who went up and down the roads saying, "It is not 
really gold!" "The man really stole it," and then he looked 
and saw beyond these the haggard faces, the crippled children, 
the sorrowing women. And above all these he saw the red 
cloud of the battle.

And the battle cloud grew taller. And it grew taller and
taller as though it hung with fire up above an entire
world. 

And the man, sitting in the desert place, looked at the 
golden ball.


 # # # #


==========================================
Appendix E. TRAINING PLAN 


[From New R&D 10 p. 320 in between HCL-21 and HCL-22 with the
caption "The Summary Course Lectures of March 1952 were later
offered as subject material of a course for all Dianeticists
and Scientologists.  Only the first page of this document
is shown and the edges of 5 more pages are shown spread out
behind it.  The tapes referred to are the original set of 27
HCL lectures.  We would like to see the entire document if
anybody has it.]


THE OFFICE OF L. RON HUBBARD 
1405 North Central Phoenix, Arizona

MANAGER'S REPORT

TRAINING PLAN 

Goal - Dianetic knowledge a part of everyone's thinking. 

Methods - Tapes (Twenty-seven hours of recorded
lectures and demonstrations.)

Texts (Basic written material plus text of each lecture.)

Tests (Knowledge of subject necessary to receive
certificate designating you as a Registered Dianeticist.)


The above listed package is labeled the SUMMARY COURSE IN
DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY. This is a course which brings
all of the latest developments in this science into one
very neat package of technique. Mr. Hubbard leads the
student through the necessary understanding of terminology;
points out each phenomena of behavior and of the mind;
demonstrates this phenomena and then leads the listener
into a recognition of the invariability of the axiom
related to this phenomena. Yes, this is the course that
will introduce you to Dianetics and Scientology, make you
acquainted with the knowledge that has been changing lives,
giving man the opportunity to be SANE, HEALTHY, AND MANAGE
HIS ENVIRONMENT. This course is designed so that the leader
of a group, the HDA, the BOOK AUDITOR can put the tapes in
operation over a set schedule and continue its operation on
the basis that a charge is made only for the books involved
- not for listening to the tapes. Testing is done only to
prove up the fact that the student has accomplished his
goal. Certificates of accomplishment are issued from this
office.

The Subject Material of the Course is as Follows:

Lecture 1.   SCIENTOLOGY: MILESTONE ONE -This tape is an
introduction to the new world of knowledge and will be used
here as an every-night opportunity for all comers who wish
to learn just what is Scientology. It is suggested that
those operating this course have volunteers work each
evening playing this tape and conducting a Seminar.

Lecture 2.   SCIENTOLOGY: MILESTONE ONE (cent.) - A second
lecture goes deeper into the wide periphery of knowledge
that Dianetics and Scientology explores and validates.

Lecture 3.   AXIOMS AND HOW THEY APPLY TO AUDITING - Basic
discoveries of knowledge that prove up Dianetics and
Scientology.

Lecture 4.   THOUGHT, EMOTION AND EFFORT - The three
working tools of rehabilitation.

Lecture 5.   EMOTION - The part it plays in the aberration
and de-aberration of man.

Lecture 6.   THOUGHT AND PRECLEARS - The handling of the
relationship of preclear with thought.

Lecture 7.   EFFORT AND COUNTER-EFFOHT

Lecture 8.   A?TACK ON THE PRE-CLEAR - This is the approach
to evaluation and processing of the Preclear.

Lecture 9.   FACSIMILES: HOW TO HANDLE RECORDINGS - What to
do with the memories - how to give an individual command of
his own recordings. 

Lecture 10.  INDOCTRINATION OF THE PRECLEAR - How to acquaint 
the predear with his past, present and future.
 
Lecture 11.  EFFORT AND COUNTER-EFFORT: OVERT ACTS - The
latest, most efficeint method of processing.

[end of page]

=========================
Appendix F. PROFESSIONAL COURSE BOOKLETS description (Tech Vol 1)


[A one page description of the Professional Course Booklets
from Old Tech Vol 1 page 274. in between material dated
August and Sept 1954.  Note that the book descriptions such
as this one are omitted from the posted version of the
old tech volumes which appeared on the net last year.]

[At the top of the page is a black & white picture of
a pile of the booklets.  The actual booklets are colored
yellow with about an inch of green along the left side,
but of course this cannot be determined from the B&W photo.]

[A shorter version of this page appears in New Tech Vol 1,
along with the notation that these booklets were published in 
the Fall of 1952.]


PROFESSIONAL COURSE BOOKLETS

By L. Ron Hubbard


The Professional Course Booklets, also known as the 50 Course
Booklets, were compiled and rewritten from transcripts of
lectures given by L. Ron Hubbard during the Spring and Summer
of 1952.

The first 27 booklets parallel the 27 lectures of the Hubbard
College Lecture Series given in Wichita in March 1952.  Booklets
28 to 31 are taken from the Technique 80 Lectures of Phoenix,
May 1952.  The reamaining 19 booklets are based on the
Technique 88 Lectures of June 1952.  Tapes of these lectures
were supplemented by the booklets and together they formed
the Professional Course.

These "50 Course Books" carried forward all the basic technology
of Dianetics and Scientology, with particular emphasis on
the material developed between January and December, 1952.
They contained an enormous amount of material fundamental to
an understanding of the mind, with many illustrations.  They
could be said to have comprised a study course in themselves,
but were at the same time part and parcel of the Professional
Course.

Although they are out of print and generally unavailable
today, the data they contained can be obtained directly from
the LRH tape lectures mentioned, obtainable from Scientology
Publications Organization, Jernbanegade 6, 1608 Copenhagen V,
Denmark.


=============================
Appendix G. NOTES ON THE PROFESSIONAL COURSE BOOKLET TAPE NUMBERING


NOTES ON THE PROFESSIONAL COURSE BOOKLETS

Theoretically, booklets 1 to 27 correspond to the 27 HCL lectures.
The booklets were an official publication, compiled by D. FOLGERE
and are mentioned in the old tech volumes.  Note that the remaining
booklets (28 to 50) correspond to the Tech 80 and Tech 88 lectures.

The booklets are only notes rather than true transcripts, and also 
include definitions, summarys of things such as the dynamics, and 
questions for the student (sometimes of poor quality - such as "Who
wrote 'The Body Snatchers'").

We examined them for further clues as to tape renumbering etc.

The first 13 roughly correspond to the lectures numbered HCL-1 to 
HCL-13 (additional lectures such as HCL-12A are not covered at
this point, but see below.)

Booklet 14 "Effort Processing, Demonstration", corresponds to
tape HCL-17 "RUNNING EFFORT AND COUNTER-EFFORT"

Booklet 15 "Training Auditors, Demonstration" corresponds to
tape HCL-14 "DEMO: EFFORT, COUNTER-EFFORT, STRAIGHTWIRE"

Tape HCL-15 TRAINING AUDITORS: THE ANATOMY OF FAC ONE, which
was posted in our second set of transcripts, has no equivallent
in the booklets.

Booklet 16 "The Anatomy of Facsimie One" correstponds to
tape HCL-2A "DEMONSTRATION OF E-METER" (included in our first
set of HCL transcripts).  This might indicate that HCL-2A is
the missing lecture HCL-16 "The Anatomy of Facsimie One (continue
demo)"

Booklet 17 "Theta Bodies" begins with the demo session that
appears in the R&D as "Theta Body Demonstration" which we have
labled HCL-DEMO and continues without a break (as if they were
one session) into the demo session given on tape HCL-27A
"How To Search for Incidents On The Track Part II".  Note that
tape HCL-17 was covered in booklet 14 as noted above.

Booklet 18 "Entities" begins with a long summary of data on 
entities most of which does not appear to be present in this
specific lecture.  It is followed by the fragmentary demo session 
that was on tape HCL-18 "Entities (demo cont.)" which was merged 
into lecture HCL-27 in the R&D volumes.  It is assumed that
Folgere took this opportunity to sumarize the entire topic of
entities.  It is possible that he had access to more material
than the versions of the tapes that are currently available to us.

Booklets 19-20 correspond to the History of Man lectures,
tapes HCL-19 and HCL-20 posted last year (time track of theta).

Booklets 21 to 23 correspond very loosly to tapes HCL-21
to 23.

Booklet 24 "Electro-psychometric Auditing" corresponds to
tape 12A which was included as the second half of HCL-12
"INDOCTRINATION IN THE USE OF THE EMETER" in our second
posting of HCL tapes.

In the Flag Master List, tape HCL-24 "Demonstration: 
Electropsychometric Scouting" is listed as consisting of
HCL-12A (as above) plus HCL-6 SPEC "AUDITING FACSIMILE ONE 
(demo session)" which was included in our first batch of posts.

Booklet's 25 to 27 correspond to tapes HCL-25 to HCL-27.  In
addition, the end of booklet 26 has a statement about the writing 
of the booklets.  But note that tapes HCL-25 and HCL-26 seem
to be older tapes from November 1951 that were renumbered into
the HCL series and given new dates in March 1952.  The booklets
have enough different material that we are uncertain whether or
not a pair of similar lectures were given in March and the older
ones substituted for some reason.

Tape HCL-27A is covered in booklet 17 as noted above.


=============================
Appendix H. HOW THESE BOOKLETS WERE WRITTEN from booklet 26


From Professional Course Lecture Summary Booklet Number 26
Page 21 to 24.  By D. Folgere.


HOW THESE BOOKLETS WERE WRITTEN

Now that this series of Summary Course booklets is drawing 
to a close, the writer feels that some communication about 
the circumstances surrounding the writing of them would not 
be out of place.

In April of 1952, a special courier arrived within the range 
of the writer bearing type-written transcripts of ten of 
Mr. Hubbard's lectures, which had very recently been given 
and recorded on tapes.  With the transcripts were two sheets 
of instructions from Mr. Hubbard which told just how the 
booklets were to be prepared and what was to be in them. The 
writer accepted the transcripts and the job but took very
few pains to follow the instructions. The first ten booklets
were written without any consultation with Mr. Hubbard, and
the following seventeen have been written after only five
days spent with Mr. Hubbard, plus a few telephone calls.

Mr. Hubbard's confidence in those who assist him is widely 
known for its dramatic qualities.  It is all or nothing at 
all.  Either he assumes that his assistants can do no wrong, 
or he fires them from cannons. In the case of these booklets, 
in a manner typical of him, Mr. Hubbard has assumed that the 
writer could do no wrong, and he has not bothered to read much 
of the material which has been prepared.

Now, some differentiation should be made by the reader between 
Mr. Hubbard and the writer, between the booklets and the tapes 
from which, for the most part, they are taken.

The writer assumes no liability for the inventions and discoveries 
of Mr. Hubbard. The writer did not invent, develop or discover 
theta, MEST, facsimiles, past lives, thought, emotion, effort, 
affinity, reality, communication, or any of the numerous other 
parts of Dianetics and Scientology. The writer refuses to assume
responsibility for any of these things and shoves the entire 
blame for them off on Mr. Hubbard.

On the other hand, Mr. Hubbard is not responsible for any of the 
bad jokes, misinterpretations, repetitions, maddening questions, 
non-sequiturs, contradictions, misspellings, typographical errors, 
or pedantic scholasticisms which some readers may fancy they find
throughout the forogoing work. D. Folgere regretfully and covertly 
assumes the responsibility for these, but will not be at home any 
time to discuss them with anybody.

The excessive mention of astronomer Fred Hoyle which appears in 
the early pages of this series is due to the fact that the writer
read THE NATURE OF THE UNIVERSE while writing the early booklets.

The writer has learned a great deal while preparing these booklets.  
Sometimes the texts of the lectures were read four or five times 
before the writer felt that he could summarize or paraphrase the 
meaning of them. Often there were little contradictions, inescapable
in an informal lecture, to be resolved. From time to time there 
were gross misrenderings by the transcriber.  In number seventeen, 
for example, the auditor asks the pre-clear if he has ever split 
anyone's head open with a mace. The first transcript which the 
writer received of this lecture substituted the word "vase" for 
"mace." Consequently, the word "vase" appears in booklet seventeen,
and it looks quite silly. The writer should have had enough on 
the ball to catch this, but didn't.

The writer hopes that the reader will be helped by these booklets 
to extract all possible information out of the recorded lectures. 
This has been a conscientious effort to render, in language quite 
different from that of Mr. Hubbard and from a much more commonplace 
point of view than that of Mr. Hubbard, the ideas which are sometimes 
so beautifully expressed and sometimes so annoyingly passed over 
or merely hinted at in the lectures.

The reader should bear in mind that the lectures were given under 
theatrical circumstances. All lectures are - whether the lecturer 
knows it or not. As he stands before his audience, he responds to 
them--- to their emotion, to their appearance, to their attention 
or lack of it. Some of these lectures were given to large audiences
and some to small; some to well-fed audiences and some to hungry; 
some to rested audiences and some to sleepy; some to depressed 
audiences and some to excited.  Occasionally, Mr. Hubbard apparently 
has felt that he had to digress from his chosen subject matter for 
long periods in order to wake his audience up or win them over or
lash them into a fury-- whatever his purpose was at that particular 
time. This makes for good listening, but the writer has sometimes 
had a hard time paraphrasing the material into what pretends to be 
an even and reasonable flow of ideas.

The writer hopes that reading the booklet will be a good substitute 
to the student for the opportunity which the writer has had to study 
the original texts of the lectures at length and in detail. It cannot 
be denied that if a thing is expressed in two ways, by two different
persons, it is more likely to be understood than if it is only 
expressed by one person; on the other hand, when that idea is the 
creation of one individual, it is hard for another individual to 
catch hold of it and turn it around and send it out again without 
missing a few of the fine points here and there.

The writer hopes that not too many of the fine points have been 
missed and thanks the reader for his attention and patience.


=============================
Appendix I. BOOKLET 18 "ENTITIES" (complete)


[This is a complete copy of booklet 18.  Tape HCL-18 is a
framentary demo which has been identified as the start of
the session in lecture HCL-27 and therefore is included there
in the transcripts.  Since the tape was short, D. Folgere
took this opportunity to write a summary of Entities as he
saw it.  This occupies the bulk of booklet 18.  The short
demo session at the end of the booklet will be found in complete
form in our transcription of lecture HCL-27.  It is included
here for the sake of completeness.]

[Since this booklet was used as professional course material
in late 1952, it seems appropriate to present this summary
of the material on entities, as an indication of what was in
use at this time.]



PROFESSIONAL COURSE LECTURE SUMMARY BOOKLET NUMBER 18

------------

Student's Name ____________

Course Date _______________

This is SCIENTOLOGY, the overall study which embraces
DIANETICS, the science of human thought.

A student of this course, with reasonable intelligence
and attention should be able to possess himself of the
basic data of though and mind operation in a few weeks
and to enable himself and his fellows to reach higher
goals of civilization than have ever before been attained.


------------

SCIENTOLOGY

Booklet 18
of the
PROFESSIONAL COURSE

BY
L. RON HUBBARD

Material from Tape Lecture

ENTITIES

Compiled in Written Form
by
D. FOLGERE

--------------


ENTITIES

1. Theta, operating in the physicaluniverse, can be said 
to do two things: it can be said to BE, and it can
be said to receive and record impressions of the
physical universe. A mind, then, can be said to be made up
of an initial and constantly reiterated decision to BE,
plus many recorded impressions of the physical universe
which are used in controlling the physical universe. This
description, however, though useful, is misleading when
applied to a living human being, since the mind of a living
human being is apparently made up of more than one BEING
and, consequently, of more than one set of recorded
impressions.

2. The beings which make up the mind of a human being are 
here called ENTITIES. They may be thought of as separate 
persons with separate past lives and memories -- though 
they may hold many memories more or less in common with 
other entities which are parts of the same mind. One entity 
may be the actor in a certain experience, another entity 
may be present only as an observer, while a third may not 
be aware of this experience at all, and still all three of 
these entities may be parts of the mind of the same human being.

3. We may begin our enumeration and description of the 
entities which make up the human mind with that entity
which is least surprising, the somatic entity. The somatic
entity is that being which carries on the evolution of an
organism, following the genetic line. The somatic entity
would include under its command all the epicenters of the
organism. The somatic entity would be independent of the
protoplasmic line, the undying organic line without which
no organism but the simplest is brought into existene
but it would follow the course of that endless flow of
organic life closely in most cases.  We might suppose that
a certain somatic entity might be named Smith in many
succeeding organisms.

It is interesting to speculate upon the relationship between 
the somatic entity and the protoplasmic line. Probably the 
closest approach which can be made at this writing is that 
the somatic entity is like an individual running along a 
road, expertly rolling a great many hoops. He would be the 
captain of a company of little life organisms, the cells, 
and particularly the reproductive cells, of the body.  
Other somatic entities might be supposed to stand by the 
side of the road, waiting for some of these hoops to become 
detached by procreation, and expecting to take charge of 
them and roll them when they became detached from the hoops 
of the first entity. There might be a group of Smith entities 
which had charge of the Smith line so long as there were 
enough Smith hoops to go around, or who called in help from 
elsewhere or split themselves when too many Smith hoops 
were created by procreation.

These hoops would, of course, have a certain amount of 
forward motion of their own. They would contain enough theta 
to continue their life briefly as cells, but their 
organization into more complete organisms would depend
upon the guiding hand of the somatic entity. If left to
themselves, they would soon slow and fall (the death of the
cell.) If left to themselves as groups (human beings) they
would slow down and break up (the death of the more complex
organism.)

The somatic entity might be supposed to be quite similar 
for an animal and a human being. The difference would be 
only that the somatic entity of the human being would be 
"bigger" and would have more work to do.

Those incidents which are run by pre-clears, the Boo-Hoo, 
the mytosis, the helper, etc, which are on the genetic line, 
are part of the memory of the somatic entity.

4. There are three or four other classes of entities making 
up the mind, besides the somatic entity. The somatic entity 
is far from being in command of the mind, although like any 
other entity it may take command under the proper circumstances.

5. The entity which is superior in the mind is called the 
theta being or THETAN. The thetan is the true "I" of the 
individual.  It is the being which would be in command of 
the mind of an individual who had become completely 
self-determined. The thetan, however, is not in command 
even most of the time for most people.

6. How does the thetan lose command?  It is a simple matter 
of postulating non-survival -- a subject about which a 
great deal has been said in earlier texts of this series.  
When the thetan encounters a situation which is very 
difficult, it may postulate that it cannot go on and
it may simply "blank out" or "go to sleep"  This
is actually a death postulate in terms of the organism.  If
the thetan were the only entity operating the organism,
such a postulate would presumably be followed by the death
of the organism.  However, the organism is immediately
taken over by another entity, and so it continues to live.

7. The thetan apparently co-exists with an entity which is 
almost its equal, but not quite.  This entity may be called 
the PARTNER.

8. Any entity may take over the whole of the organism and 
may exist as the whole organism but each entity has a
position of its own, where it may be considered to act,
customarily. 

9. The Thetan occupies the head, facing forward. 

10. The Partner occupies the head, facing backwards.

11. The next entity is the RIGHT INSIDE or RIGHT INBOARD entity.

12. The next entity is the LEFT INSIDE or LEFT INBOARD entity.

13. The next is the STOMACH entity.

14. Two more are the LEFT OUTSIDE or LEFT OUTBOARD entity and 
the RIGHT-OUTSIDE or RIGHT OUTBOARD entity.

15. Last in rank is the faithful SOMATIC entity.

16. Now the question arises, if the somatic entity is
the only one which is intimately connected with the genetic
line of the organism, when do the other entities join the
organism? The most accurate answer which can be given at
this time is that the thetan and the other principle
entities join the organism just before birth. The two
outboard entitles, however, seem to be added after birth,
although not much evidence has been examined on that
subject at this writing.

17. Besides the thetan and the partner and these
principle entities and the somatic entity, there may be a
number of second-rate entities, called the IDLE ENTITIES.

These join the organism at the invitation of some entity.
They appear to be gathered up by the entity for the purpose
of life continuum.  If the individual, under the command of
a particular entity, performs an overt act, killing
someone, he may as that entity invite some entity of the
victim to join his organism and be a part of his organism. 
This invitation would be for the purpose of continuing the
life of the victim and "proving" that no overt act has been
performed after all.

Idle entities are characterized by a certain decadence. 
They have apparently not enough force left in them to make 
them capable of running an organism, and so they drift 
about at the beck and call of other entities.

18. Any of the principle entities may have another organism, 
or MEST body, besides the one which is the individual in 
question.  As we have seen in the previous demonstrations, 
an entity may have a body on another planet.

19. Therefore, we have two kinds of sharing: one organism 
may be inhabited by many entities; and one entity may 
inhabit more than one organism.

20. Any entity which inhabits an organism is capable of
producing a somatic in that organism. This should indicate
the futility of embarking upon an auditing procedure of
running out somatics, to the exclusion of thought, emotion
and effort. Somatics can be run out, but there is an
alInost infinite number of them, since each entity may have
millions, to be over-conservative.

21. Different entities respond to different auditors. For 
this reason, a case which is being audited by one auditor,
say a man, may turn into a very different case when being
audited by another auditor, say a woman. If the auditor 
understands why this happens, he can do something to 
correct it.

22. Sometimes the auditor will find himself auditing an
incident in which the pre-clear is "out of valence" The
pre-clear is an observer, watching the organism go through
the experience. What is happening is that the auditor is
auditing an entity which was aware of the experience but
was not in command of the organism during the experience.
This entity will have some charge on the experience as an
observer and may be audited as an observer. The main charge
will be on the entity which was in command, but that charge
may have put that entity to "sleep", leaving some other
entity in command. Auditing the observer through the
incident will usually wake up the former command entity in
the incident, and then the main charge may be run.

23. Second and third year students will readily
recognize the same old phenomena with which they are so
familiar being explained more profitably in the light of
new phenomena turned up by later research. In all these
theories as they develop, the mind remains the same. We are
just getting a better and better picture of it as we go
along. And as the picture improves, so do results.

24. Many of the phenomena which have been observed and then 
evaluated by former theories have now to be reevaluated by 
this new theory. Some of them are the File Clerk, Valence, 
Circuits.

25. If the auditor asks the pre-clear to give the first
answer which occurs to him in terms of yes-or-no, or a
number or a name at the snap of the auditor's fingers, the
preclear may give information which he has been otherwise
unable to give. This phenomenon has been called the File
Clerk phenomenon.  Later research and theory suggests that
"File Clerk" answers are solutions to problems which are
being offered by the thetan, which is operating at a
reduced level of awareness but which still retains enough
awareness to overrule the commanding entity now and then,
particularly when directly addressed by the auditor.

26. A circuit is a theoretical item, described as a
portion of the mind, compartmented by a postulate which is
enforced by pain, acting as another person within the mind.
(An even earlier definition substituted "phrase" for
"postulate", but since a phrase is only a counter-effort
unless accompanied by a postulate, the presence of the
postulate was understood.) This definition has now been
improved upon. It has been improved upon so much that the
word circuit is not longer a necessary word in the
vocabulary of the auditor. A circuit may now be considered
an entity ("a portion of the mind... compartmented...
acting as another person within the mind...") which is out
of present time (under the influence of a postulate which
is enforced by pain.)  An entity which is out of present
time. The new definition simplifies the old, clarifies it,
and renders the word "circuit" obsolete.

27. Some entities are out of present time, When they
take command of the organism or conflict with the entity
which is in command, the postulates which are keeping them
out of present time and which are present in the incidents
in which they are caught are entered into the thinking of 
the organism.

When an entity which is psychotic, because it is out of
present time, takes command of the organism, the organism
becomes psychotic. The thetan retires for the duration and
we say that the "I" of this individual has disappeared.

28. A valence is a mimicry of another person.  There is
much in common between the vaudeville performer who
imitates Lionel Barrymore and the individual who has
assumed the identity of his deceased grandfather. The main
difference is that the vaudeville performer has assumed the
identity of Lionel Barrymore for a few moments, knowingly,
for the purpose of entertaining an audience, and the other
individual has assumed the identity of his deceased
grandfather during a period of years (or even centuries)
"unknowingly" for the purpose of continuing the life of his
grandfather in order to prove that the overt act which he
committed against his grandfather did not really happen,
since grandfather is not really dead. This mimicry will be
carried out by one of the individual's entities.

29. A valence is, then, only a mimicry.  An individual
would no longer be said to be "out of his own valence" when
his thetan was not in command, since the idea of entities
relieves the word valence of double duty.  (Formerly,
"valence" meant both the mimicry and the entity which was
doing the mimicry, a doubling which caused some confusion.) 
The individual does not mimic himself, he IS himself.
Valence becomes purely and simply mimicry. Various of the
individual's entities mimic various other persons.  He
shifts his valence by shifting entities.  Or, if he is a
vaudeville performer, he shifts valence by deciding to
mimic first one person and then another.

30. This subject of valence, in reference to the actor,
has long been of high interest to many people. Just what
does an actor do when he "becomes his part"? Why do some
actors walk onto the stage or before the camera, do their
part well and convincingly, and then walk off and
immediately drop the character which they have assumed? Why
do others "throw themselves into their parts" so deeply
that sometimes traces of the character which they have
played stick to them ever afterwards. We say of one actor,
"Jones can play any part you give him. He is a good
workman." We say of another, "Elsie is a great actress. 
She becomes the character. She lives her part." We say of
another, "Ever since Jukes played the Corsican Bandit he
wears a sword, even around the house." What makes these
differences? We may, perhaps, come closer to an explanation
at this writing than anyone has come before. We may say
that Jones assumed identities consciously, like a
vaudeville performer, and casts them off as quickly.  He is
good at mimicry.  He has his facsimiles well under control.
Elsie, on the other hand, may not have her facsimiles so
well under control. Her "greatness" may come from putting
an entity in command which has a valence or which IS a
character much like the one she is supposed to play. This
entity may continue in command throughout the production,
changing Elsie's personality considerably for that period.
After the production, she may say to herself, "Well, I'm
through with that character! Whew! What a relief! At
times I really felt that I was Lucretla Borgia! And she
may succeed in getting her thetan or some other entity back
into command. Poor Jukes, however, has given command to
some entity in order to take advantage of the personality
of that entity or of some valence of which that entity is
capable, and then he has been unable to get that entity out
of the driver's seat.  He wears a sword around the house. 
Many actors do this.  Sometimes it is a great success.

31. The goal of the auditor is to restore complete
self-determinism to the thetan.

32. All entities other than the thetan have been brought
into the "family circle" by the thetan or by entities which
were brought in by the thetan. The thetan has agreed to
have these entities. If full self-determinism is restored
to the thetan, he will no longer have to have these entities.

33. When the auditor is auditing a pre-clear of whom a
certain entity is in command, the auditor, is, in effect,
auditing that entity.

34. The auditor may choose which entity he wishes to audit.

35. The purpose of the auditor in auditing an entity
other than the thetan is to clear the way for auditing the
thetan.

36. If another entity is in command, the auditor may have 
to bring that entity to present time before he can get
very far with the thetan. This procedure will produce the
effect of bringing the pre-clear from a more or less
psychotic frame of mind to comparative rationality.

37. Some entities will have elsewhere bodies which
will have to be abandoned.

38. If an entityis stuck in an incident, this entity can
be freed by running the incident in the ordinary way, with
thought, emotion and effort. If the entity is too low in
awareness to go through the incident, the thetan, working
with the auditor, may be able to push this entity through
the incident in spite of itself,

39. Successful and unsuccessful self-auditing may be
decided by this one factor: what is the intention toward
the individual of the entity which is doing the auditing?
What does this entity wish to accomplish? If it is the
thetan which has learned to audit, some very good results
may be obtained. But if it is some aberrated entity, who
has been controlled and controlled and controlled until the
only goal left for him is to control and enslave whatever
organism falls into his clutches, the auditing results may
be horrendous.

40. Any case which does not run easily for an auditor is
most likely not under the command of the thetan. Other
entities will have to be gotten out of the way before the
case will run easily. It is not necessary to clear these
entities.  It is necessary to bring them to present time
and help the thetan to take over their control of the organism.

41. Some cases used to be called "out of valence" This meant
that they were not "themselves", We would say now, of such 
a case, that one entity had been in command at one time,
and now another entity was in command.  The auditor is, 
perforce, auditing the entity which is now in command. If 
he tries to run the pre-clear through an incident which
occured when the former entity was in command, he will 
discover that the pre-clear recalls this incident as 
though he were only an observer --- which is just what
this entity was.

42. The auditor has to know which entity he is auditing
in order to know what he is doing.  Accuracy in knowing
which entity is being audited will depend, in most cases,
upon the use of an E-meter. The added view into the mind
which the E-Meter gives the auditor will make it much
easier to know to whom he is listening.

43. In what used to be called "perceptic shut-off", the
entity which is being audited is either stuck on the track
or else it just did not experience the incident which the
auditor is trying to run.  The incident was experienced by
some other entity.

44. An individual, for this reason, might well bz on his
way toward self-determinism and still have poor recall on
some incident which had happened to another enitity. In
order to find the data on that incident, the auditor would
have to ask the entity which had experienced it.

45. An amnesia case may be suspected of operating on a
data bank (memory) which is not from the present life.

46. In a homosexual, an entity of the opposite sex is in 
command.

47. Theta is creative.  It can make new things.  The
rule which we have all heard so many times, that
imagination is merely a recombining of old experiences,
does not hold, evidently. The power of theta to create
extends much deeper into the MEST universe than our former
educators would have had us believe, It may be possible to
give some estimate of the depth of this creativity in
subsequent writing. As the relationship between theta and
MEST is examined, the borderline between them becomes
harder to find, and theta emerges more and more as CAUSE. 
It begins to look as though theta may be the cause not only
of the organization of MEST but also of the very existence
of MEST. Even this subject is within the second echelon of
knowledge. We may suppose that the question "What is the
cause of theta?" lies within the third echelon.

48. EXPERIENCE is a sort of MEST substitute for KNOWING,
which is a function of theta. We have seen how some
quick-thinking individuals can learn an operation so
rapidly that they appear to have known it all along, while
others may experienCe the same operation many times and
still make mistakes in it.  These differences between
individuals are very great, even as we observe them in
daily life. There is no reason to suppose,however, that
these great differences account for more than a very narrow
band of the spectrum of KNOWING. At the upper end of this
spectrum, experience may bg something which is just not
necessary, or is necessary to such a slight degree that it
could hardly be called experience.

49. If this idea of the importance of experience is a
valid one, then the value of facsimiles is also altered.
The computation of courses of action by comparison of
facsimiles comes under the heading of experience to a
larger degree.  Possible, an individual who KNOWS (who is
at the upper end of the spectrum of KNOWING) would consider
any facsimiles which he had bothered to keep as mere relics
of something he had decided for the moment to call "past", 
and possibly he would not compute any courses of action 
from facsimiles but would merely look at present time and 
KNOW what course to follow.

It may be that the intellectual processes which we have 
come to regard as the highest possible activity of the
beings which we are, admirable as these processes may seem
to us, are merely aberrations and perversions of the true
state of KNOWING.  (This is not a new idea, of course, and
many will recognize it from antiquity, It may be, however,
that we have come to a point where we can do something
about this idea.)


DEMONSTRATION

AUD: How old are you?
P.C. Ages. 
AUD: Is it worse than ages? How about trillions of years?
  Or millions? 
P.C. Three or four trillion years old. 
AUD: Were you originally just one entity? 
P.C. Yes.

AUD: (Begins to plot the theta time-track of the preclear 
  on a blackboard.) What did you think of?  (There has 
  been a drop on the E-Meter.) 
P.C. Some ancient buildings.
AUD: Are these in the theta universe or the MEST universe?
  (Watching meter) Between lives? Or before there were any 
  between-lives? Is that where you live? In this planetary system?
P.C. Very far away. I get an impression of a very bright atar.
AUD: How long ago was this?
P.C. Eight million years. 
AUD: What happened there? Did things blow up? Is that whole 
  civilization blowing up? Were you a slave?

P.C. No.
AUD: Was that a point of high charge on your track? What 
  happened to you there that was bad? 
P.C. I just killed everybody.
AUD: Why? Was it a dull afternoon or something? Was there any 
  cause for it than that? That's all right. That's the way 
  we used to be.

P.C. I did something. I did an experiment, and the whole 
  place blew up. 
AUD: Get a good clear recall; get the clearest moment in that.
  Is there another moment that is real to you? Any part of 
  that cycle? 
P.C. A very tall man.

AUD: Is he real to you? How is your communication with this 
  very tall man? Does he like you? 
P.C. No. 
AUD: Was that the trouble? 
P.C. No, I just did something I shouldn't have done. I was 
  fooling around with something I shouldn't have been.

AUD: Was this man related to you? 
P.C. No. He was just the head of it. Not a ruler. Just in charge 
  of the laboratory.

AUD: Do you like chemistry sets? 
P.C. Oh, no.
AUD: Does your theta being (thetan) need education?
P.C. No.
AUD: How does it feel to be educated?
P.C. Not necessary.... the education.

AUD: Okay. Well, we have here, then, an incident that is a minor
  overt act on the fourth dynamic-would you say that it was the 
  fourth dynamic?
P.C. Definitely.
AUD: Have you ever been put together with some other souls?
P.C. Yes.

AUD: When?
P.C. I did a damn fool thing, I Was curious. I don't get any 
  visio. I was curious and cut off my nose to spite my face.
AUD: How long ago was it?
P.C. A long time ago.

AUD: What did you do, volunteer?
P.C. No. Somebody told me that I'd better watch out.
AUD: And you were curious?
P.C. I wanted to find out what would happen.
AUD: Is this after the civilization blew up? 
P.C. A long time after.


51. This demonstration, though fragmentary, shows a little about 
procedure In establishing the time track of the thetan.  The 
auditor is looking for overt acts and for a time when other 
entities were added to the thetan. The pre-clear has said at 
the beginning the thetan was alone.


  SEMINAR QUESTIONS 

 Lecture XVIII Entities


1. Is a mind's memory limited to one
sequence of past lives?   Explain.

2. Can any organism exist independent
of the protoplasmic line?

3. When can a somatic entity take control
of the mind? What is its rank?

4. What past phenomena must be re-evaluated
in the light of new theories ?

5. What is meant by auditing an observing entity?


=============================

Appendix J. BOOKLET 25 "ANALYSIS OF MEMORY AND ABBERATION I" (complete)

[This is a complete copy of booklet 25.]

 - Posted with tape HCL-25.


=============================

Appendix K. BOOKLET 26 "ANALYSIS OF MEMORY AND ABBERATION II" (remainder)

[This is the remainder of booklet 26.  See appendix H for the
other section.]

 - Posted with tape HCL-26

=======================

End of Appendix

=======================





