From anon@squirrel.owl.de Sat Aug 22 14:13:12 1998 Path: newscene.newscene.com!novia!dca1-hub1.news.digex.net!digex!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news Date: 22 Aug 1998 21:13:12 -0000 From: Secret Squirrel Comments: Please report problems with this automated remailing service to . The message sender's identity is unknown, unlogged, and not replyable. Subject: FZ BIBLE 12/13 ROUTE TO INFINITY TAPES Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.clearing.technology Message-ID: <99d95a7003cda674dea0a39fc0b548ee@anonymous.poster> Mail-To-News-Contact: postmaster@nym.alias.net Organization: mail2news@nym.alias.net Lines: 711 Xref: newscene.newscene.com alt.religion.scientology:515529 alt.clearing.technology:62609 FREEZONE BIBLE ASSOCIATION TECH POST THE ROUTE TO INFINITY TAPES (TECH 80 LECTURES) 12/13 Our purpose is to promote religious freedom and the Scientology Religion by spreading the Scientology Tech across the internet. The Cof$ abusively suppresses the practice and use of Scientology Tech by FreeZone Scientologists. It misuses the copyright laws as part of its suppression of religious freedom. The writings of LRH form our Old Testament just as the writings of Judiasm form the Old Testament of Christianity. We might not be good and obedient Scientologists according to the definitions of the Cof$ whom we are in protest against. But the Christians are not good and obedient Jews and yet are allowed to have their old testament regardless of any Jewish opinion. We ask for the same rights, namely to practice our religion as we see fit and to have access to our holy scriptures without fear of the Cof$ copyright terrorists. We ask for others to help in our fight. Even if you do not believe in Scientology or the Scientology Tech, we hope that you do believe in religious freedom and will choose to aid us for that reason. Thank You, The FZ Bible Association ************************************************** (21 May 52 THERAPY SECTION OF 80: PART II, continued from part 11 of 13) Now, there's an anesthesia which is very, very intimate to you. It's on your body, and most people to some degree have anesthesias. And there are very many ways to undo these anesthesias; many of them are much more complex than this Technique 80 method. And Technique 88 does them even more rapidly, but it's dynamite. And Technique 80 is your prelude and lead-up to a use of 88. You're doing with 80 an expansion of beingness, an expansion of feelingness, an expansion of livingness into yourself and all the dynamics on out. Technique 80 makes it possible, by these simple mechanisms, to invest, any way you please, any of the dynamics, or invest all of them, and gives you a high level of beingness with you in a body and all right with the world - as far as you're concerned, there in the body. Eighty-eight sweeps up and audits with hammer and tongs a method - the various methods which were used in the past to make you have a body; it audits those out and blows you out of the body. But 80 is very good here, and some people are so conservative and so forth that they think they ought to have bodies. Most people have their fingerprints on record that have been in the armed services and so forth, and the FBI and that sort of thing, and they think this sort of should attach them to the society one way or the other. People have a responsibility about having a body. They think they've agreed to have one; that's one of the tricks. But Technique 80 should not be put into any wild classification or any wild category at all. Whether or not you believe that you could be able to do without a body with great ease is beside the point as far as Technique 80 is concerned. Technique 80 is an extension of beingness and it works in that direction. Now, there's another little subtrick on Technique 80 that I'll tell you about. And that's when the incident shows up, burn it down. It's very interesting. You're the disintegrator ray. And I told you about going over this incident and over it and over it. And why does it erase? Well, you're burning it up. You're not rubbing it out; there's nothing MEST there to rub on. You're just burning it up; you burn it up, burn it up and finally it blows. Well, there's no reason why you can't just sort of get mmmmmm-psshew! Now, the fact of the matter is, you take a light lock - take some little light lock that's completely inconsequential and practice on it for a while and say, "How do I burn this thing down?" Get a visio - a visio of something - and just go finally, until you find out how to make the visio go. And oddly enough, if you get the trick rather easily, it will then develop on up the line with magnitude. But, of course, there is an implant on the track that tells you you shouldn't do this, you shouldn't do this. This is bad; bad to burn things up like this, because you've got to have facsimiles! "I tell you, if you didn't have facsimiles, you wouldn't have any experience; if you didn't have any experience, you wouldn't remember how police could get so tough, and you wouldn't remember it enough to do all that labor for us! And so you've got to have facsimiles, and they're very valuable, and therefore let's all study eidetic psychology because a facsimile is the only important thing! Beingness is not important but the facsimile is important, so therefore you got to have pictures of everything you've ever seen, been and felt or heard. Don't go ramming up and down the time track through time, you know, and taking a look in person - not done." Anybody here, by the way, every time he tries to go back down the time track and return to another place, just sort of sits and looks at himself sitting where he was sitting? I mean, he never quite gets out of present time whenever he starts to look at something? Anybody here who does that? Yeah, he says, "I'm going back to the time when I was sitting in the chair there and scan all that out." And he doesn't seem to go anyplace and he looks at himself sitting in the chair. And he runs it a couple of times and it's gone, but what he's actually doing is he dubs himself in as sitting in the chair and then dubs in the incident that happened to him and then says, "Now, I'll run it out." And so he rubs out what he dubbed in and then he says, "Now I feel better." Well, a facsimile is a little bit different than that. A facsimile is pretty quote unquote "solid." But somebody else would love you to have facsimiles and you don't need any. The less facsimiles you have, the faster you can think. The less facsimiles you have, the better off you are. And yet the second you start to rub out the whole bank - and if you were to suddenly say "I'm going to take all of my memory banks, and I'm going to wipe them all out - psheww!" Oh, you say "O-o-o-oh, no. No, no. No, because that's me. Hm-hm. Yep, yep, all those memories, they're me. You see, I don't exist anywhere, so those memories are me. So if I wiped out any of these memories, of course, I would be gone. Yeah, I need those." You get people who have this so bad, by the way, that locks won't blow. And that is the principal reason why locks won't blow on some preclears: because they've got to have this memory bank because this memory bank is them. Actually, it is not them at all. They are a vital spark of beingness. And that vital spark of beingness happens to be cause, and it happens to know, and it can know anything it wants to know instantly. And it's a wonderful little gimmick and it's the one that does all of your thinking for you anyhow. But an implant can be put on to you to such a degree that you've agreed that this and that is the case, so the best thing for you to do is to go back and look at the facsimile or go back and remember what you were taught in school or go back and do something or other, and then think it all out and then get into present time again and then say "Well, I remember it." Oh! It's nonsense! There is no knowledge worth knowing that's in your memory bank. All the knowledge that's worth knowing is outside your memory bank - in complete and perfect contact with the beingness that is you. Seems hard to believe, doesn't it? But, actually, you can understand completely how an automobile drives by being the automobile. You can slide in behind the wheel. Maybe sometime when you were a little kid you could do this before some grownup grabbed ahold of you and said "Ooh, oooh - no, no! No, we have to teach you. And we're going to teach you now. Now, let's start in at the beginning and let's not try to run before we learn how to walk. Now, now if you learn this thoroughly, we can get you feeling mighty stupid, and then, then we can get a lot of work out of you when you grow up." But there have been times in your life when you suddenly looked at something and you knew it. And then maybe a question came into your mind; "Well, how could I possibly have known it, because I didn't have access to it?" Well, you were it for a moment, so of course you knew it. And the whole business of knowingness is beingness. If you can be something you can certainly know it; if you know something you can certainly be it. There's no trouble with that, but it doesn't have anything to do with time - nothing to do with time. Now, after you have learned to be along all the dynamics, expansively all the way out, in relationship to you as a body, then you can start very adequately to be all the dynamics, so that all the dynamics can clear up, so that all the dynamics can come up tone scale. And of course, when you finish that project utterly, there will be no universe left. But that's all right; that's all right. Somebody by that time will have gotten into such shape, I'm sure, that he can think a couple of thoughts and there will be one again. All this universe is, is a thought. That's why some people get so very careful about unthinking things. They say, "I mustn't unthink this, because something is liable to disappear around here." They have that definite feeling, "I mustn't unthink." You'll run into that. But as you go out along the line with Technique 80, don't be afraid of skipping - don't be afraid of skipping around if your preclear just suddenly starts to head out over something or other, and you know he's not quite ready to soar yet. Don't worry - he'll fall on his face; he'll come back to where you think he should be. So let him go. But let's not have any of this, with this technique, of the guy suddenly saying "Oh, beingness: to be, to be, to be, to be, to be. Yeah. Now I got the postulate. There I am. Now the whole world is it, now that's - that's that; I'm Clear." Because if it could happen that fast, there would be lots of guys I know who wouldn't be here tonight. It just doesn't happen that fast. And let's not have this sort of thing: The fellow is sitting down, and you say, "What are you doing?" "I'm being." You say, "Brother, you went too far! Come here, come here. This is where you ought to be, right here." If you find people being very careful about being, too, that's very interesting. But just for your own edification and just to illustrate for yourselves some understanding, you should make this little experiment tonight, tomorrow, of looking at a rough object and being the surface of the object. And look at a smooth object and be the surface of that object. Just try it a few times on a few objects and a few things, and you will all of a sudden sense that there's more there than you knew what of. And that will give you just a little touch of reality. Of course, that will come in automatically as you clear along these dynamics; it will come in automatically the second that you get the first dynamic cleared up, or halfway clear, but you should try it out because it's quite an experience. You see, you don't need to be the effect of sound, sight and so forth to be, because you can be the sound, be the sight; you can be the source of the sound and the sight, you see? This unnecessarily complicated world into which you are born this generation has indulged in a little too much search for randomity. Too many people have selected too many people out for too many kinds of randomity. That is to say, we've gotten too high a level of individuation. Engrams create individuation. Dickens' ch&acters are very great individuals; they are walking engrams. All you have to do to take an individual of this characteristic and spin him round and round and round is just key him in a little bit stronger, because if he's that (quote) "individual" (unquote) he's on the thin edge. Actually, your sense of individuality is much, much higher than that as you go up the tone scale. You become more and more sensible that you are you, even though you can be elsewise. Something you should realize. Another thing here that I should remark on is the fact that all this is perfectly safe to enter upon, particularly since the ethic value of the individual increases as he goes up the tone scale. He cannot indulge in this technique without going up the tone scale. And as soon as he begins to, his ethic level rises. His ability to be cause, then, is very stable and it becomes good cause. Good cause. The other thing I should remark on here is that you are going to hit apathy on the line as you run this technique. And if you hit something on the line that makes you think you have been put in a printing press and binding press and so on, very solid, if you hit a somatic that is just - all of a sudden an incident that's just thaaah, you just can't move it or anything, don't think that it is some present-time activation or something of the sort, or you've suddenly been sailed in on by an entity or something: It's an apathy incident. Apathy is almost solid matter, and apathy has a timelessness about it. Apathy is very hard for some auditors to run because they won't recognize it for what it is; it's almost matter. Well, you just plow on through the thing, you plow on through it, and you plow on through it. You don't have to run it so much with the emotion as you have to run it with a disintegrator pistol - prrr! And the next thing you know, why, you've burned up the apathy. But, also, don't be too disappointed if you run an apathy incident for three weeks, because an apathy incident is so timeless that it takes quite a while to run them sometimes. Many of the somatics that go around and pass for 1.5 somatics on the tone scale are actually apathy somatics. And you get the distinguishment between the two and they'll resolve, but if you kept trying to run them as complete wholes they won't resolve. All it is is a complete not-beingness with a confusion. And if you get a complete not-beingness with a confusion even about that, the fellow just - thaah. And he'll get some nasty somatics. And because they don't run out right quick, he thinks he's stuck in a chronic somatic. Well, the thing might be running out; he might have been running it out for the last year or so, but you can speed it up a little bit as an auditor and he'll go through the thing fairly rapidly. But you're going to run into a feeling of apathy here and there. And all it is that creates apathy is unresolved problems, so you can get an apathy up without running it. And if you find somebody sticking too long in an apathy incident, get him without running it. There is an apathy about knowinguess. There is a plant on the track which, every time a person tries to know, he goes into apathy. You know how to resolve that; it's very simple. It's just all the times your preclear tried to keep somebody from knowing. Very simple. Don't bother to run the apathy. Then all of a sudden this shows up and "I'm not to know," it says, and the guy is just stuck right there. Don't bother to run it as a feeling or a concept so much, because it's clear down here on the tone scale and you'll be three or four weeks running it. Just skip it and say, "Well, let's get all the times when you kept somebody from knowing," or so on, because it's an overt act, you see? And the guy has had a maybe on it, and he knew it wasn't right to keep people from knowing but he did anyhow, and that wasn't right. And after all, he was dependent on knowing, himself, but he didn't let the other fellow know and so therefore - so on. And you start running off, you'll find a chain of locks will spring off, on this. Second they spring off your apathy incident should blow. Because apathy is at once the whole bottom of the Chart of Attitudes. And any time you get one of these concepts that shows up at the bottom of the Chart of Attitudes, you can either run it as a concept clear on up the line or you can find the time that the individual on that dynamic enforced it. You see, "I am not." You get "I am not" and the fellow starts running - oh, he runs this terrific apathy. Ohhh, his chest feels solid and so on; he says, "Oh, why did I ever start into this Technique 80? I'm practically dead." Your auditor, if he's very sadistic, says, "Well, let's start in at the beginning of it and run it." The guy will probably only run it for three or four years; that is, if he lives that long! What you want to do, you see, is to spring the overt acts on "I am not." How many people has he tried to convince that they were not? Or how many children did he try to convince they were not? Or how many pets? Or how many times did he try to convince MEST that it was not? You know? Beat it down, beat it down, beat it down. Because you'll find then that the other incident will spring, spring with ease. And if you're an agile auditor, if you understand this technique, if you run it on the basis of running the feeling long enough to get the overt or the dependency, you got a very rapid technique here. If you're running it with an E-Meter, particularly, it becomes a rapid technique, because then you're spotting. Nobody can lie to you, and they'll lie, lie, lie, when it comes to telling you about what they are justifying. They won't tell you about the time they took little Agnes down and held her in the mud puddle for minutes and plastered her face around and broke her left leg. No sir. So here we go on a speed-run up to the top: Get to the overt and the dependency acts, and run it right up the top with overt and dependency acts - spotting them, spotting them, spotting them with an E-Meter. Getting them into sight, getting them into sight, running them - dynamic, dynamic, dynamic, one after the other. All right, that's fast; but it's as fast as the auditor is agile. Any auditor will get there someday; any auditor will get there someday, so that I can't tell you this is a fast technique really or a slow technique until I see in whose hands and with what equipment. Now, if he's running without equipment, it's going to make it longer; it will make it considerably longer. And if he's just going to run the feelings all by themselves, it's going to make it a lot longer, but he might even have a better job in the end if he ran it with all the feelings. You don't know. But if you're going to run it just long enough to find out what it is or run it up the tone scale a little bit - preclear gets the feel of it, you've spotted it on the meter, you knock out the incident, you go on to the next part of the body - it could be a very rapid technique. So I would say at a conservative estimate, it takes anywheres between twenty and five hundred hours. And I want to make that precise estimate for you, so that you will know exactly how long it will take you to go through Technique 80! I hope you've at least been restimulated somewhat by these talks these last three nights! I wrote down some very nonsensical lines there and put them on a piece of paper. That's really just horseplay, but I thought some of you might find it amusing. There's also some clues to 88 in there. [See the "Dianetics Jingles" in the Appendix.] But I thought you might find it amusing on that handout tonight. And please don't frame it or anything. And don't tell anybody who wrote it! I want to thank all of you for being here. And I hope that the organization here can be of service to you, and I hope that we've at last, at least come into the lower points of our objective, and that Dianetics can sail on from here with a little less upset than it's had in the past. Certainly we have the muzzle loaded, double-charged weapon now of techniques which work. We've got handbooks that work better and do more for people than auditing did two years ago. And we've got a lot of technology, a lot of technology. We got a lot of validation. It's the kind of validation you don't even have to write down. People around the country now know Dianetics works. The old surge of invalidate, invalidate is sort of passing by the boards. The only reason they invalidate now is they're kind of scared. Well, I don't blame them. Here I am telling you about Technique 80. On June the 15th, I'm going to start in teaching a professional class here. And there's going to be a summer session I think on the 23rd, and the week of the 23rd I'm going to talk about Technique 88. Here we are talking about a technique which does the most dangerous, horrible thing that could happen: It deprives people of bodies to put to work and it lessens police power. And that's pretty bad. So don't tell anybody about this. In the first place they probably wouldn't believe you - unless they stopped and thought for a moment and thought how many times they stepped in and out of their body every day anyhow. You know, if you want to know whether or not you can get in and out of your body, have you ever been out of valence? Have you ever, by the way, been so thoroughly out of valence in present time that you were sitting looking at yourself all of a sudden? It can happen; it can happen. Well, don't think that there is any difficulty in getting out of your body at a low level on the tone scale; the real difficulty is staying in, and that's why you're worried about it. You're on a complete nervous anxiety and almost worn to pieces with trying to stay in this piece of MEST. And we can either resolve that anxiety with Technique 80, or we can just let you abandon the whole thing with 88. And by the way, people who do run 88 have to furnish their own coffins! We won't furnish those here. You also have to leave a suicide note for the police. And you also have to promise me to do me one favor. Well, I want to thank you very much for coming down here to the groves, and I do hope to see you again in later series of lectures. Good night. ==================================== Appendix 1. The Circle and ARC Triangle 89 2. Tone Scale and Dynamics 91 3. Wavelength of ARC Scale 93 4. The Tone Scale of Decisions 95 5. Expanding Periphery of Dynamics 97 6. Dianetics Jingles 99 ==================================== APPENDIX 1: THE CIRCLE AND ARC TRIANGLE (If you print the book - you need to complete this chart by hand - connect the dots of the triangle, then, arc a circle around the triangle - touching the points of the triangle and the A-R-C outside the circle. The 0 is inside the circle under the base of the triangle - Infinity (oo) is inside the triangle under the A. - (FZ.B.A.) ) A . . .oo . . . . . C.........R 0 ========================== APPENDIX 2: TONE SCALE AND THE DYNAMICS 8 | 40.0 || TO BE | d || 7 | || | y 32.0 || 6 | || | || t 5 | n || | 22.0 || 4 | a || o | || 3 | 15.0 || | m || n 2 | || | || 1 | i 4.0 || e | || | c || | 2.0 || | s || | 1.5 || | || | 0.5 || | || | 0 || NOT TO BE This diagram is referred to in the first lecture of 19 May 1952. ============================================ APPENDIX 3: WAVELENGTH OF ARC SCALE (Note: This chart is handwritten by LRH. The oo is an infinity sign. WL = Wavelength. cm = centimeters (FZ.B.A.) ) 0 __________________________oo WL or 0.0 WL. 39.0 __________.00000000000000000000000002 cm. aesthetics 8.0 ______________________ .0000002 cm Analytical Thought 1.5 ______________________ .024 cm Emotion Tone WL. This diagram referred to in the third lecture of 19 May 1952. ========================================= APPENDIX 4: TONE SCALE OF DECISIONS Unaberrated conduct to a marked degree is the making of decisions which can be put into effect as opposed to making decisions which cannot be put into effect and down to indecision and lower to irrational decision into effect, down to indecision and down to the decision not to be. This scale handwritten by L. Ron Hubbard, is referred to in the first lecture of 20 May 1952 ============================================ APPENDIX 5: EXPANDING PERIPHERY OF DYNAMICS (This diagram cannot be duplicated here - it consists of concentric circles with the innermost circle being the 1st dynamic and the outermost circle being the 8th dynamic FZ.B.A.) This diagram is referred to in the second lecture of 20 May 1952 ================================================= APPENDIX 6: DIANETIC JINGLES (This is a reproduction of the mimeographed handout lecture of 21 May 1952. mentioned by Ron at the end of the final Anything you can take, you can make. Anything you can see, you can be. Anything you shun will have won. Anything you have done you can do. Anything that is work is a shirk. Anything you desire means expire. If you ever need bait just create. If a motion comes in, use and win. If a motion you won't use you will lose. If all motion comes in, that's a sin. If motion from you flows, the world glows. If beauty you desire, beauty transpire. If tone tends toward spin, you're taking motion in. If tone is to soar, create even more. If you don't want the real, always steal. If you want the whole sky, never buy. If you don't want remorse, just be source. If you don't want to see, with all motion agree. If you want to be tall, just be all. If you ever repent, you are spent. If you act in today you keep morrow away. If you act in the past, you won't last. If you say you aren't God, you are sod. If you have to be liked, you are spiked. If you choose to agree, you're a tree. If you want others' gain, you're insane. If all things you eschew, they are glue. If your body you'd leave, don't believe. The way out of MEST ain't detest. If you'd soar to the blue, just go through. If all things you would flee, these you'll be. If you want to destroy, just annoy. If you just want to heal, make him real. All the things that come in are a sin. Whatever is cause, to it everything draws. Whatever is wrecked was effect. If high tones shun the low, the suns brighter glow. When a high tone fights entheta, he comes in very later. Entheta is just matter kicking up a final splatter. If your MEST is in disorder, your case is on the border. If your MEST is in good shape, you haven't time to hate. If all things you would create, you'd better be in time and date. If through other's thoughts you plow, you will come at last to now. If you don't want to be attacked don't draw back. If all evil you'd burn down simply up and build a town. There is no trick to being unless you spend your time agreeing. If you don't have a datum, create 'em. The only unknown are in other men's domes. The real universe is a hearse. The right way to be is to be. When aesthetics are sex, there've been wrecks. If you want to be pure don't endure. If you want to last just move fast. If all things you'd deserve, don't preserve. If the world's all your brother, you're just another. Those who gave us mystic were sadistic. No wise man should stammer because another shuns his grammar. Don't ever go down scale, because MEST won't get up and cheer and hail! If you would overrate, just let it make you rate. The bottom of disease is anxiety to please. You can blame your whole confusion on the fact you bought illusion. The always last sung song, "I was wrong." You'll never climb a steeple if you worry about people. If you can't bring yourself to killing, you are another's willing. If all misery is bested, you've the universe invested. Just because it made you fall doesn't prove that it is all. If you get caught in the middle, it's because you've bought a riddle. If you want things in delirium, just get serium. If the engrams you'd keep in, study hard to know of sin. If you want an empty larder, tell yourself you must work harder. If your vision is all blurry, you've bought another's worry. If you want to be in chains, let some other buy your brains. If from another's grace you'd fall, just pretend that you aren't all. If you find yourself well under, it's because you defined blunder. The entire source of pain is an effort to abstain. A calm and peaceful mind has refused to put trouble behind. A really sharp obsession is from lack of self-confession. If you want to really let it, forget it. If you want to get real tragic, forget it was just magic. If you really want the stutters, respect the rights of others. If you want to be tearful, be careful. The upset of tradition is the way to eat roast pigeon. The craving for a drink is creation of a brink. The desire to be hugged is a craving to be drugged. A creeping inhibition is a stable definition. The only reason some people find ambition is a spike is they don't try to be, they try to be like. If you're awfully deject, you're defect. ================================================